[v1] test/crypto: fix comparison function for modex values

Message ID 20240715133836.1579-1-gmuthukrishn@marvell.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: akhil goyal
Headers
Series [v1] test/crypto: fix comparison function for modex values |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/loongarch-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/loongarch-unit-testing success Unit Testing PASS
ci/github-robot: build success github build: passed
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-abi-testing success Testing PASS
ci/intel-Functional success Functional PASS
ci/iol-compile-amd64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-unit-arm64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-compile-arm64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-unit-amd64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-sample-apps-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-marvell-Functional success Functional Testing PASS

Commit Message

Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan July 15, 2024, 1:38 p.m. UTC
Fix comparison function used by modex test to check from
first non-zero value itself.

Coverity issue: 430125
Fixes: 2162d32c1c3 ("test/crypto: validate modex from first non-zero")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
---
 app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Anoob Joseph July 16, 2024, 6:06 a.m. UTC | #1
> Subject: [PATCH v1] test/crypto: fix comparison function for modex values
> 
> Fix comparison function used by modex test to check from first non-zero value
> itself.
> 
> Coverity issue: 430125
> Fixes: 2162d32c1c3 ("test/crypto: validate modex from first non-zero")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>

Acked-by: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
  
Akhil Goyal July 19, 2024, 1:03 p.m. UTC | #2
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] test/crypto: fix comparison function for modex values
> 
> > Subject: [PATCH v1] test/crypto: fix comparison function for modex values
> >
> > Fix comparison function used by modex test to check from first non-zero value
> > itself.
> >
> > Coverity issue: 430125
> > Fixes: 2162d32c1c3 ("test/crypto: validate modex from first non-zero")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
> 
Applied to dpdk-next-crypto
  

Patch

diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
index 1d88832146..f0b5d38543 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
@@ -3197,21 +3197,26 @@  static int send_one(void)
 }
 
 static int
-modular_cmpeq(const uint8_t *a, const uint8_t *b, size_t len)
+modular_cmpeq(const uint8_t *a, size_t a_len, const uint8_t *b, size_t b_len)
 {
-	const uint8_t *new_a = a, *new_b = b;
+	const uint8_t *new_a, *new_b;
 	size_t i, j;
 
 	/* Strip leading NUL bytes */
-	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < a_len; i++)
 		if (a[i] != 0)
-			new_a = &a[i];
+			break;
 
-	for (j = 0; j < len; j++)
+	for (j = 0; j < b_len; j++)
 		if (b[j] != 0)
-			new_b = &b[i];
+			break;
+
+	if (a_len - i != b_len - j)
+		return 1;
 
-	if (i != j || memcmp(new_a, new_b, len - i))
+	new_a = &a[i];
+	new_b = &b[j];
+	if (memcmp(new_a, new_b, a_len - i))
 		return 1;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -3251,7 +3256,7 @@  modular_exponentiation(const void *test_data)
 
 	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(send_one(),
 		"Failed to process crypto op");
-	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(modular_cmpeq(vector->reminder.data,
+	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(modular_cmpeq(vector->reminder.data, vector->reminder.len,
 			self->result_op->asym->modex.result.data,
 			self->result_op->asym->modex.result.length),
 			"operation verification failed\n");