diff mbox series

kni: remove non-C11 path from FIFO sync

Message ID 20210819060442.19014-1-joyce.kong@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Thomas Monjalon
Headers
Series kni: remove non-C11 path from FIFO sync |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch warning coding style issues
ci/github-robot: build success github build: passed
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-aarch64-unit-testing fail Testing issues
ci/iol-broadcom-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-x86_64-unit-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-x86_64-compile-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-aarch64-compile-testing success Testing PASS

Commit Message

Joyce Kong Aug. 19, 2021, 6:04 a.m. UTC 
Non-C11 path was meant to not break build with GCC version < 4.7(when
C11 atomics were introduced), while now minimum GCC version supported
by DPDK has been 4.9, C11 atomics support in compiler is no longer a
problem. So non-C11 path can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
 lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h |  9 ++------
 lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h   | 48 +++++++---------------------------------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

Comments

Joyce Kong Oct. 21, 2021, 6:19 a.m. UTC | #1 
Hi,

I'm seeing the CI failure with Arm-gigabyte due to automic_autotest and malloc_autotest failures. 
While this patch is not related to these unit tests since it only modified kni part, this may be a common CI issue.

Also, would you please have a review about this patch?

Thanks,
Joyce

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Joyce Kong
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 2:05 PM
> To: ferruh.yigit@intel.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: remove non-C11 path from FIFO sync
> 
> Non-C11 path was meant to not break build with GCC version < 4.7(when
> C11 atomics were introduced), while now minimum GCC version supported
> by DPDK has been 4.9, C11 atomics support in compiler is no longer a
> problem. So non-C11 path can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> ---
>  lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h |  9 ++------
>  lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h   | 48 +++++++---------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h b/lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h index
> b547ea5501..20d94eaa9b 100644
> --- a/lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h
> +++ b/lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h
> @@ -58,13 +58,8 @@ struct rte_kni_request {
>   * Writing should never overwrite the read position
>   */
>  struct rte_kni_fifo {
> -#ifdef RTE_USE_C11_MEM_MODEL
> -	unsigned write;              /**< Next position to be written*/
> -	unsigned read;               /**< Next position to be read */
> -#else
> -	volatile unsigned write;     /**< Next position to be written*/
> -	volatile unsigned read;      /**< Next position to be read */
> -#endif
> +	unsigned write;     /**< Next position to be written*/
> +	unsigned read;      /**< Next position to be read */
>  	unsigned len;                /**< Circular buffer length */
>  	unsigned elem_size;          /**< Pointer size - for 32/64 bit OS */
>  	void *volatile buffer[];     /**< The buffer contains mbuf pointers */
> diff --git a/lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h b/lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h index
> d2ec82fe87..057f6b3ded 100644
> --- a/lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h
> +++ b/lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h
> @@ -2,38 +2,6 @@
>   * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
>   */
> 
> -
> -
> -/**
> - * @internal when c11 memory model enabled use c11 atomic memory
> barrier.
> - * when under non c11 memory model use rte_smp_* memory barrier.
> - *
> - * @param src
> - *   Pointer to the source data.
> - * @param dst
> - *   Pointer to the destination data.
> - * @param value
> - *   Data value.
> - */
> -#ifdef RTE_USE_C11_MEM_MODEL
> -#define __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(src) ({                         \
> -		__atomic_load_n((src), __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);           \
> -	})
> -#define __KNI_STORE_RELEASE(dst, value) do {               \
> -		__atomic_store_n((dst), value, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);   \
> -	} while(0)
> -#else
> -#define __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(src) ({                         \
> -		typeof (*(src)) val = *(src);                       \
> -		rte_smp_rmb();                                      \
> -		val;                                                \
> -	})
> -#define __KNI_STORE_RELEASE(dst, value) do {               \
> -		*(dst) = value;                                     \
> -		rte_smp_wmb();                                      \
> -	} while(0)
> -#endif
> -
>  /**
>   * Initializes the kni fifo structure
>   */
> @@ -59,7 +27,7 @@ kni_fifo_put(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data,
> unsigned num)
>  	unsigned i = 0;
>  	unsigned fifo_write = fifo->write;
>  	unsigned new_write = fifo_write;
> -	unsigned fifo_read = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->read);
> +	unsigned fifo_read = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->read,
> __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>  		new_write = (new_write + 1) & (fifo->len - 1); @@ -69,7
> +37,7 @@ kni_fifo_put(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data, unsigned num)
>  		fifo->buffer[fifo_write] = data[i];
>  		fifo_write = new_write;
>  	}
> -	__KNI_STORE_RELEASE(&fifo->write, fifo_write);
> +	__atomic_store_n(&fifo->write, fifo_write, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
>  	return i;
>  }
> 
> @@ -81,7 +49,7 @@ kni_fifo_get(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data,
> unsigned num)  {
>  	unsigned i = 0;
>  	unsigned new_read = fifo->read;
> -	unsigned fifo_write = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->write);
> +	unsigned fifo_write = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->write,
> __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>  		if (new_read == fifo_write)
> @@ -90,7 +58,7 @@ kni_fifo_get(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data,
> unsigned num)
>  		data[i] = fifo->buffer[new_read];
>  		new_read = (new_read + 1) & (fifo->len - 1);
>  	}
> -	__KNI_STORE_RELEASE(&fifo->read, new_read);
> +	__atomic_store_n(&fifo->read, new_read, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
>  	return i;
>  }
> 
> @@ -100,8 +68,8 @@ kni_fifo_get(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data,
> unsigned num)  static inline uint32_t  kni_fifo_count(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
> {
> -	unsigned fifo_write = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->write);
> -	unsigned fifo_read = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->read);
> +	unsigned fifo_write = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->write,
> __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> +	unsigned fifo_read = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->read,
> __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
>  	return (fifo->len + fifo_write - fifo_read) & (fifo->len - 1);  }
> 
> @@ -111,7 +79,7 @@ kni_fifo_count(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)  static inline
> uint32_t  kni_fifo_free_count(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)  {
> -	uint32_t fifo_write = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->write);
> -	uint32_t fifo_read = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->read);
> +	uint32_t fifo_write = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->write,
> __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> +	uint32_t fifo_read = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->read,
> __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
>  	return (fifo_read - fifo_write - 1) & (fifo->len - 1);  }
> --
> 2.17.1
Ferruh Yigit Nov. 15, 2021, 11:25 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 8/19/2021 7:04 AM, Joyce Kong wrote:
> Non-C11 path was meant to not break build with GCC version < 4.7(when
> C11 atomics were introduced), while now minimum GCC version supported
> by DPDK has been 4.9, C11 atomics support in compiler is no longer a
> problem. So non-C11 path can be removed.

As far as I remember the non-C11 path implemented because of performance
difference, wasn't it, please check commit:
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=39368ebfc6067d0c82d76bdf4298ff9b8d257f21

Can you please point the reference where discussed to have non-C11 for because
of old compiler support?


Also how x86 is affected?
Previously it was just assignment because it was using non-C11 model and
'rte_smp_rmb' & 'rte_smp_wmb' are only compiler barrier.
Is the '__atomic_load_n()' noop for the x86? Since we are removing 'volatile'
from variables, I suspect it is not.


And finally, is there a downside to keep both models?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> ---
>   lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h |  9 ++------
>   lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h   | 48 +++++++---------------------------------
>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h b/lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h
> index b547ea5501..20d94eaa9b 100644
> --- a/lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h
> +++ b/lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h
> @@ -58,13 +58,8 @@ struct rte_kni_request {
>    * Writing should never overwrite the read position
>    */
>   struct rte_kni_fifo {
> -#ifdef RTE_USE_C11_MEM_MODEL
> -	unsigned write;              /**< Next position to be written*/
> -	unsigned read;               /**< Next position to be read */
> -#else
> -	volatile unsigned write;     /**< Next position to be written*/
> -	volatile unsigned read;      /**< Next position to be read */
> -#endif
> +	unsigned write;     /**< Next position to be written*/
> +	unsigned read;      /**< Next position to be read */
>   	unsigned len;                /**< Circular buffer length */
>   	unsigned elem_size;          /**< Pointer size - for 32/64 bit OS */
>   	void *volatile buffer[];     /**< The buffer contains mbuf pointers */
> diff --git a/lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h b/lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h
> index d2ec82fe87..057f6b3ded 100644
> --- a/lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h
> +++ b/lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h
> @@ -2,38 +2,6 @@
>    * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
>    */
>   
> -
> -
> -/**
> - * @internal when c11 memory model enabled use c11 atomic memory barrier.
> - * when under non c11 memory model use rte_smp_* memory barrier.
> - *
> - * @param src
> - *   Pointer to the source data.
> - * @param dst
> - *   Pointer to the destination data.
> - * @param value
> - *   Data value.
> - */
> -#ifdef RTE_USE_C11_MEM_MODEL
> -#define __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(src) ({                         \
> -		__atomic_load_n((src), __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);           \
> -	})
> -#define __KNI_STORE_RELEASE(dst, value) do {               \
> -		__atomic_store_n((dst), value, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);   \
> -	} while(0)
> -#else
> -#define __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(src) ({                         \
> -		typeof (*(src)) val = *(src);                       \
> -		rte_smp_rmb();                                      \
> -		val;                                                \
> -	})
> -#define __KNI_STORE_RELEASE(dst, value) do {               \
> -		*(dst) = value;                                     \
> -		rte_smp_wmb();                                      \
> -	} while(0)
> -#endif
> -
>   /**
>    * Initializes the kni fifo structure
>    */
> @@ -59,7 +27,7 @@ kni_fifo_put(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data, unsigned num)
>   	unsigned i = 0;
>   	unsigned fifo_write = fifo->write;
>   	unsigned new_write = fifo_write;
> -	unsigned fifo_read = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->read);
> +	unsigned fifo_read = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->read, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>   		new_write = (new_write + 1) & (fifo->len - 1);
> @@ -69,7 +37,7 @@ kni_fifo_put(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data, unsigned num)
>   		fifo->buffer[fifo_write] = data[i];
>   		fifo_write = new_write;
>   	}
> -	__KNI_STORE_RELEASE(&fifo->write, fifo_write);
> +	__atomic_store_n(&fifo->write, fifo_write, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
>   	return i;
>   }
>   
> @@ -81,7 +49,7 @@ kni_fifo_get(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data, unsigned num)
>   {
>   	unsigned i = 0;
>   	unsigned new_read = fifo->read;
> -	unsigned fifo_write = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->write);
> +	unsigned fifo_write = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->write, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>   		if (new_read == fifo_write)
> @@ -90,7 +58,7 @@ kni_fifo_get(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data, unsigned num)
>   		data[i] = fifo->buffer[new_read];
>   		new_read = (new_read + 1) & (fifo->len - 1);
>   	}
> -	__KNI_STORE_RELEASE(&fifo->read, new_read);
> +	__atomic_store_n(&fifo->read, new_read, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
>   	return i;
>   }
>   
> @@ -100,8 +68,8 @@ kni_fifo_get(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data, unsigned num)
>   static inline uint32_t
>   kni_fifo_count(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
>   {
> -	unsigned fifo_write = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->write);
> -	unsigned fifo_read = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->read);
> +	unsigned fifo_write = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->write, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> +	unsigned fifo_read = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->read, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
>   	return (fifo->len + fifo_write - fifo_read) & (fifo->len - 1);
>   }
>   
> @@ -111,7 +79,7 @@ kni_fifo_count(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
>   static inline uint32_t
>   kni_fifo_free_count(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
>   {
> -	uint32_t fifo_write = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->write);
> -	uint32_t fifo_read = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->read);
> +	uint32_t fifo_write = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->write, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> +	uint32_t fifo_read = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->read, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
>   	return (fifo_read - fifo_write - 1) & (fifo->len - 1);
>   }
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h b/lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h
index b547ea5501..20d94eaa9b 100644
--- a/lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h
+++ b/lib/kni/rte_kni_common.h
@@ -58,13 +58,8 @@  struct rte_kni_request {
  * Writing should never overwrite the read position
  */
 struct rte_kni_fifo {
-#ifdef RTE_USE_C11_MEM_MODEL
-	unsigned write;              /**< Next position to be written*/
-	unsigned read;               /**< Next position to be read */
-#else
-	volatile unsigned write;     /**< Next position to be written*/
-	volatile unsigned read;      /**< Next position to be read */
-#endif
+	unsigned write;     /**< Next position to be written*/
+	unsigned read;      /**< Next position to be read */
 	unsigned len;                /**< Circular buffer length */
 	unsigned elem_size;          /**< Pointer size - for 32/64 bit OS */
 	void *volatile buffer[];     /**< The buffer contains mbuf pointers */
diff --git a/lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h b/lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h
index d2ec82fe87..057f6b3ded 100644
--- a/lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h
+++ b/lib/kni/rte_kni_fifo.h
@@ -2,38 +2,6 @@ 
  * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
  */
 
-
-
-/**
- * @internal when c11 memory model enabled use c11 atomic memory barrier.
- * when under non c11 memory model use rte_smp_* memory barrier.
- *
- * @param src
- *   Pointer to the source data.
- * @param dst
- *   Pointer to the destination data.
- * @param value
- *   Data value.
- */
-#ifdef RTE_USE_C11_MEM_MODEL
-#define __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(src) ({                         \
-		__atomic_load_n((src), __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);           \
-	})
-#define __KNI_STORE_RELEASE(dst, value) do {               \
-		__atomic_store_n((dst), value, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);   \
-	} while(0)
-#else
-#define __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(src) ({                         \
-		typeof (*(src)) val = *(src);                       \
-		rte_smp_rmb();                                      \
-		val;                                                \
-	})
-#define __KNI_STORE_RELEASE(dst, value) do {               \
-		*(dst) = value;                                     \
-		rte_smp_wmb();                                      \
-	} while(0)
-#endif
-
 /**
  * Initializes the kni fifo structure
  */
@@ -59,7 +27,7 @@  kni_fifo_put(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data, unsigned num)
 	unsigned i = 0;
 	unsigned fifo_write = fifo->write;
 	unsigned new_write = fifo_write;
-	unsigned fifo_read = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->read);
+	unsigned fifo_read = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->read, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
 		new_write = (new_write + 1) & (fifo->len - 1);
@@ -69,7 +37,7 @@  kni_fifo_put(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data, unsigned num)
 		fifo->buffer[fifo_write] = data[i];
 		fifo_write = new_write;
 	}
-	__KNI_STORE_RELEASE(&fifo->write, fifo_write);
+	__atomic_store_n(&fifo->write, fifo_write, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
 	return i;
 }
 
@@ -81,7 +49,7 @@  kni_fifo_get(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data, unsigned num)
 {
 	unsigned i = 0;
 	unsigned new_read = fifo->read;
-	unsigned fifo_write = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->write);
+	unsigned fifo_write = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->write, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
 		if (new_read == fifo_write)
@@ -90,7 +58,7 @@  kni_fifo_get(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data, unsigned num)
 		data[i] = fifo->buffer[new_read];
 		new_read = (new_read + 1) & (fifo->len - 1);
 	}
-	__KNI_STORE_RELEASE(&fifo->read, new_read);
+	__atomic_store_n(&fifo->read, new_read, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
 	return i;
 }
 
@@ -100,8 +68,8 @@  kni_fifo_get(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo, void **data, unsigned num)
 static inline uint32_t
 kni_fifo_count(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
 {
-	unsigned fifo_write = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->write);
-	unsigned fifo_read = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->read);
+	unsigned fifo_write = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->write, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
+	unsigned fifo_read = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->read, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
 	return (fifo->len + fifo_write - fifo_read) & (fifo->len - 1);
 }
 
@@ -111,7 +79,7 @@  kni_fifo_count(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
 static inline uint32_t
 kni_fifo_free_count(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
 {
-	uint32_t fifo_write = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->write);
-	uint32_t fifo_read = __KNI_LOAD_ACQUIRE(&fifo->read);
+	uint32_t fifo_write = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->write, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
+	uint32_t fifo_read = __atomic_load_n(&fifo->read, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
 	return (fifo_read - fifo_write - 1) & (fifo->len - 1);
 }