diff mbox series

ethdev: update qfi definition

Message ID 20210323121134.19113-1-rasland@nvidia.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Ferruh Yigit
Headers
Series ethdev: update qfi definition |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/travis-robot success travis build: passed
ci/github-robot success github build: passed
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-abi-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-testing success Testing PASS

Commit Message

Raslan Darawsheh March 23, 2021, 12:11 p.m. UTC 
  qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
(Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
(QoS Flow Identifier)

This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.

note: changing the default mask would cause different
patterns generated by testpmd.

Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
---
 doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 3 ++-
 lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Ferruh Yigit March 26, 2021, 1:12 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 3/23/2021 12:11 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
> PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
> (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
> (QoS Flow Identifier)

Can you please put a reference for above information?

> 
> This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
> to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
> 
> note: changing the default mask would cause different
> patterns generated by testpmd.
> 
> Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
> Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 3 ++-
>   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 4 ++--
>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and their attributes, if any.
>   - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
>   
>     - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
> -  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
> +
> +  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
>   
>   - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
>   
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> index 669e677e91..79106e0246 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> @@ -1392,14 +1392,14 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
>    */
>   struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
>   	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> +	uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
>   };

By design requirement, rte_flow_item_* should start with the relevant protocol 
header.

There is already a deprecation notice for using protocol header directly in the 
rte_flow_item* [1] and Adrew/Ivan already fixed a few of them [2].

Your patch is not directly related on this, but since you are touching to the 
flow_item, would you mind create a protocol struct for it first, and use it in 
the "struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc"?
So the protocol related update can be done in the protocol header, instead of 
rte_flow struct.


[1]
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst?h=v21.02#n99

[2]
https://git.dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net/commit/?id=4a061a7bd70bfa023de23e8e654e
Ori Kam March 29, 2021, 8:53 a.m. UTC | #2 
Hi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: update qfi definition
> 
> On 3/23/2021 12:11 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> > qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
> > PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
> > (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
> > (QoS Flow Identifier)
> 
> Can you please put a reference for above information?
> >
> > This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
> > to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
> >
> > note: changing the default mask would cause different
> > patterns generated by testpmd.
> >
> > Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
> > Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >   doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 3 ++-
> >   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 4 ++--
> >   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and their
> attributes, if any.
> >   - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
> >
> >     - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
> > -  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
> > +
> > +  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
> >
> >   - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > index 669e677e91..79106e0246 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > @@ -1392,14 +1392,14 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta
> rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
> >    */
> >   struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
> >   	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> > -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> > +	uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
> >   };
> 
> By design requirement, rte_flow_item_* should start with the relevant protocol
> header.
> 
> There is already a deprecation notice for using protocol header directly in the
> rte_flow_item* [1] and Adrew/Ivan already fixed a few of them [2].
> 
> Your patch is not directly related on this, but since you are touching to the
> flow_item, would you mind create a protocol struct for it first, and use it in
> the "struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc"?
> So the protocol related update can be done in the protocol header, instead of
> rte_flow struct.
> 
+1

> 
> [1]
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.
> org%2Fdpdk%2Ftree%2Fdoc%2Fguides%2Frel_notes%2Fdeprecation.rst%3Fh%3
> Dv21.02%23n99&amp;data=04%7C01%7Corika%40nvidia.com%7C6391a4c0640
> f4592b70b08d8f058e322%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0
> %7C637523611870497932%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAw
> MDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdat
> a=vU%2F5oO47zb9erTnZL1pl9j0nHCKzea3NJgOeo1FTW0Q%3D&amp;reserved=
> 0
> 
> [2]
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.
> org%2Fnext%2Fdpdk-next-
> net%2Fcommit%2F%3Fid%3D4a061a7bd70bfa023de23e8e654e&amp;data=04%
> 7C01%7Corika%40nvidia.com%7C6391a4c0640f4592b70b08d8f058e322%7C43
> 083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637523611870497932%7CU
> nknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik
> 1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=WurlQ5VSLqFGVthfRj363xZsC
> No3xJuvxNQCFVcxdkk%3D&amp;reserved=0
Raslan Darawsheh March 29, 2021, 9:06 a.m. UTC | #3 
Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:53 AM
> To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
> <rasland@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Andrew Rybchenko
> <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>; Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
> Cc: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Shiri Kuzin
> <shirik@nvidia.com>; ying.a.wang@intel.com; stable@dpdk.org; NBU-
> Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Olivier Matz
> <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: update qfi definition
> 
> Hi
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: update qfi definition
> >
> > On 3/23/2021 12:11 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> > > qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
> > > PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
> > > (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
> > > (QoS Flow Identifier)
> >
> > Can you please put a reference for above information?
> > >
Sure, will send in V2,

> > > This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
> > > to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
> > >
> > > note: changing the default mask would cause different
> > > patterns generated by testpmd.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
> > > Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > >   doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 3 ++-
> > >   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 4 ++--
> > >   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > > index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
> > > --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > > +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > > @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and
> their
> > attributes, if any.
> > >   - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
> > >
> > >     - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
> > > -  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
> > > +
> > > +  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
> > >
> > >   - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > index 669e677e91..79106e0246 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > @@ -1392,14 +1392,14 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta
> > rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
> > >    */
> > >   struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
> > >   	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> > > -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> > > +	uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
> > >   };
> >
> > By design requirement, rte_flow_item_* should start with the relevant
> protocol
> > header.
> >
> > There is already a deprecation notice for using protocol header directly in
> the
> > rte_flow_item* [1] and Adrew/Ivan already fixed a few of them [2].
> >
> > Your patch is not directly related on this, but since you are touching to the
> > flow_item, would you mind create a protocol struct for it first, and use it in
> > the "struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc"?
> > So the protocol related update can be done in the protocol header, instead
> of
> > rte_flow struct.
> >
> +1
Sure, I can create the new protocol and use it , and will send in V2. But, wouldn't it cause any ABI breakage ?
> 
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.d
> pdk.
> >
> org%2Fdpdk%2Ftree%2Fdoc%2Fguides%2Frel_notes%2Fdeprecation.rst%3F
> h%3
> >
> Dv21.02%23n99&amp;data=04%7C01%7Corika%40nvidia.com%7C6391a4c064
> 0
> >
> f4592b70b08d8f058e322%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0
> >
> %7C637523611870497932%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjA
> w
> >
> MDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sda
> t
> >
> a=vU%2F5oO47zb9erTnZL1pl9j0nHCKzea3NJgOeo1FTW0Q%3D&amp;reserve
> d=
> > 0
> >
> > [2]
> >
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.d
> pdk.
> > org%2Fnext%2Fdpdk-next-
> >
> net%2Fcommit%2F%3Fid%3D4a061a7bd70bfa023de23e8e654e&amp;data=0
> 4%
> >
> 7C01%7Corika%40nvidia.com%7C6391a4c0640f4592b70b08d8f058e322%7C43
> >
> 083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637523611870497932%7CU
> >
> nknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI
> 6Ik
> >
> 1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=WurlQ5VSLqFGVthfRj363xZs
> C
> > No3xJuvxNQCFVcxdkk%3D&amp;reserved=0
Ferruh Yigit March 29, 2021, 11:14 a.m. UTC | #4 
On 3/29/2021 10:06 AM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
>> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:53 AM
>> To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
>> <rasland@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Andrew Rybchenko
>> <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>; Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
>> Cc: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Shiri Kuzin
>> <shirik@nvidia.com>; ying.a.wang@intel.com; stable@dpdk.org; NBU-
>> Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Olivier Matz
>> <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
>> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: update qfi definition
>>
>> Hi
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: update qfi definition
>>>
>>> On 3/23/2021 12:11 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
>>>> qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
>>>> PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
>>>> (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
>>>> (QoS Flow Identifier)
>>>
>>> Can you please put a reference for above information?
>>>>
> Sure, will send in V2,
> 
>>>> This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
>>>> to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
>>>>
>>>> note: changing the default mask would cause different
>>>> patterns generated by testpmd.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
>>>> Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 3 ++-
>>>>    lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 4 ++--
>>>>    2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
>>>> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and
>> their
>>> attributes, if any.
>>>>    - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
>>>>
>>>>      - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
>>>> -  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
>>>> +
>>>> +  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
>>>>
>>>>    - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
>>>> index 669e677e91..79106e0246 100644
>>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
>>>> @@ -1392,14 +1392,14 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta
>>> rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
>>>>     */
>>>>    struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
>>>>    	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
>>>> -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
>>>> +	uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
>>>>    };
>>>
>>> By design requirement, rte_flow_item_* should start with the relevant
>> protocol
>>> header.
>>>
>>> There is already a deprecation notice for using protocol header directly in
>> the
>>> rte_flow_item* [1] and Adrew/Ivan already fixed a few of them [2].
>>>
>>> Your patch is not directly related on this, but since you are touching to the
>>> flow_item, would you mind create a protocol struct for it first, and use it in
>>> the "struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc"?
>>> So the protocol related update can be done in the protocol header, instead
>> of
>>> rte_flow struct.
>>>
>> +1
> Sure, I can create the new protocol and use it , and will send in V2. But, wouldn't it cause any ABI breakage ?

For the protocol header, it won't be problem since it is a new struct.

For the flow item struct, it may be, that is why need to use a union for now, 
please check what Adrew/Ivan did.

>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.d
>> pdk.
>>>
>> org%2Fdpdk%2Ftree%2Fdoc%2Fguides%2Frel_notes%2Fdeprecation.rst%3F
>> h%3
>>>
>> Dv21.02%23n99&amp;data=04%7C01%7Corika%40nvidia.com%7C6391a4c064
>> 0
>>>
>> f4592b70b08d8f058e322%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0
>>>
>> %7C637523611870497932%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjA
>> w
>>>
>> MDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sda
>> t
>>>
>> a=vU%2F5oO47zb9erTnZL1pl9j0nHCKzea3NJgOeo1FTW0Q%3D&amp;reserve
>> d=
>>> 0
>>>
>>> [2]
>>>
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.d
>> pdk.
>>> org%2Fnext%2Fdpdk-next-
>>>
>> net%2Fcommit%2F%3Fid%3D4a061a7bd70bfa023de23e8e654e&amp;data=0
>> 4%
>>>
>> 7C01%7Corika%40nvidia.com%7C6391a4c0640f4592b70b08d8f058e322%7C43
>>>
>> 083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637523611870497932%7CU
>>>
>> nknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI
>> 6Ik
>>>
>> 1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=WurlQ5VSLqFGVthfRj363xZs
>> C
>>> No3xJuvxNQCFVcxdkk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
Ferruh Yigit April 14, 2021, 12:40 p.m. UTC | #5 
On 3/23/2021 12:11 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
> PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
> (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
> (QoS Flow Identifier)
> 
> This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
> to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
> 
> note: changing the default mask would cause different
> patterns generated by testpmd.
> 
> Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
> Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>

Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>

Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.


Sorry for going through multiple versions, hopefully proper solution can be 
merged after deprecation notice on v21.11.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@  This section lists supported pattern items and their attributes, if any.
 - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
 
   - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
-  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
+
+  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
 
 - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
 
diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
index 669e677e91..79106e0246 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
@@ -1392,14 +1392,14 @@  static const struct rte_flow_item_meta rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
  */
 struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
 	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
-	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
+	uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
 };
 
 /** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC. */
 #ifndef __cplusplus
 static const struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc
 rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask = {
-	.qfi = 0x3f,
+	.qfi = 0xff,
 };
 #endif