Fix incorrect calculations for LPM adds, LPM deletes,
and average cycles in RCU QSBR perf tests
Since, rcu qsbr tests run for 'RCU_ITERATIONS' and not
'ITERATIONS', replace 'ITERATIONS' with 'RCU_ITERATIONS'
for calculating adds, deletes, and cycles.
Also, for multi-writer perf test, each writer only writes
half of NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES.
For 2 writers, total adds (or deletes) should be
(RCU_ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES) instead of
(2 * RCU_ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES).
Since, for both the single and multi writer tests, total adds/deletes
is equal to (RCU_ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES),
this has been replaced with a macro 'TOTAL_WRITES' and furthermore,
'g_writes' has been removed since it is always a fixed value
equal to TOTAL_WRITES.
Fixes: eff30b59cc2e ("test/lpm: add RCU performance tests")
Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
---
app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 45 ++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ static struct rte_rcu_qsbr *rv;
static volatile uint8_t writer_done;
static volatile uint32_t thr_id;
static uint64_t gwrite_cycles;
-static uint64_t gwrites;
/* LPM APIs are not thread safe, use mutex to provide thread safety */
static pthread_mutex_t lpm_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
@@ -60,6 +59,8 @@ static uint32_t num_ldepth_route_entries;
#define NUM_ROUTE_ENTRIES num_route_entries
#define NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES num_ldepth_route_entries
+#define TOTAL_WRITES (RCU_ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES)
+
enum {
IP_CLASS_A,
IP_CLASS_B,
@@ -432,7 +433,6 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)
uint8_t core_id = (uint8_t)((uintptr_t)arg);
uint32_t next_hop_add = 0xAA;
- RTE_SET_USED(arg);
/* 2 writer threads are used */
if (core_id % 2 == 0) {
si = 0;
@@ -472,9 +472,6 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)
total_cycles = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
__atomic_fetch_add(&gwrite_cycles, total_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
- __atomic_fetch_add(&gwrites,
- 2 * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES * RCU_ITERATIONS,
- __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
return 0;
}
@@ -528,7 +525,6 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
writer_done = 0;
__atomic_store_n(&gwrite_cycles, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
- __atomic_store_n(&gwrites, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
@@ -548,14 +544,11 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
goto error;
- printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n",
- 2 * ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
- printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n",
- 2 * ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
+ printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
+ printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %"PRIu64" cycles\n",
- __atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) /
- __atomic_load_n(&gwrites, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
- );
+ __atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
+ / TOTAL_WRITES);
/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
writer_done = 1;
@@ -581,7 +574,6 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
writer_done = 0;
__atomic_store_n(&gwrite_cycles, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
- __atomic_store_n(&gwrites, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
/* Launch reader threads */
@@ -600,14 +592,11 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
goto error;
- printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n",
- 2 * ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
- printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n",
- 2 * ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
+ printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
+ printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %"PRIu64" cycles\n",
- __atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) /
- __atomic_load_n(&gwrites, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
- );
+ __atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
+ / TOTAL_WRITES);
writer_done = 1;
/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
@@ -711,11 +700,10 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
}
total_cycles = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
- printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
- printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n",
- ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
+ printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
+ printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %g cycles\n",
- (double)total_cycles / (NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES * ITERATIONS));
+ (double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
writer_done = 1;
/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
@@ -771,11 +759,10 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
}
total_cycles = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
- printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
- printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n",
- ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
+ printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
+ printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %g cycles\n",
- (double)total_cycles / (NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES * ITERATIONS));
+ (double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
writer_done = 1;
/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */