[v7,16/16] test/distributor: ensure all packets are delivered

Message ID 20201010160508.19709-17-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: David Marchand
Headers
Series fix distributor synchronization issues |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-testing success Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/travis-robot success Travis build: passed
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS

Commit Message

Lukasz Wojciechowski Oct. 10, 2020, 4:05 p.m. UTC
  In all distributor tests there is a chance that tests
will send packets to distributor with rte_distributor_process()
before workers are started and requested for packets.

This patch ensures that all packets are delivered to workers
by calling rte_distributor_process() in loop until number
of successfully processed packets reaches required by test.
Change is applied to every first call in test case.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
---
 app/test/test_distributor.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Hunt, David Oct. 12, 2020, 7:46 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Lukasz,

On 10/10/2020 5:05 PM, Lukasz Wojciechowski wrote:
> In all distributor tests there is a chance that tests
> will send packets to distributor with rte_distributor_process()
> before workers are started and requested for packets.
>
> This patch ensures that all packets are delivered to workers
> by calling rte_distributor_process() in loop until number
> of successfully processed packets reaches required by test.
> Change is applied to every first call in test case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
> ---
>   app/test/test_distributor.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_distributor.c b/app/test/test_distributor.c


Thanks for the quick turnaround.

Acked-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
  

Patch

diff --git a/app/test/test_distributor.c b/app/test/test_distributor.c
index 4fc10b3cc..3c56358d4 100644
--- a/app/test/test_distributor.c
+++ b/app/test/test_distributor.c
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@  sanity_test(struct worker_params *wp, struct rte_mempool *p)
 	struct rte_mbuf *returns[BURST*2];
 	unsigned int i, count;
 	unsigned int retries;
+	unsigned int processed;
 
 	printf("=== Basic distributor sanity tests ===\n");
 	clear_packet_count();
@@ -116,7 +117,11 @@  sanity_test(struct worker_params *wp, struct rte_mempool *p)
 	for (i = 0; i < BURST; i++)
 		bufs[i]->hash.usr = 0;
 
-	rte_distributor_process(db, bufs, BURST);
+	processed = 0;
+	while (processed < BURST)
+		processed += rte_distributor_process(db, &bufs[processed],
+			BURST - processed);
+
 	count = 0;
 	do {
 
@@ -304,6 +309,7 @@  sanity_test_with_mbuf_alloc(struct worker_params *wp, struct rte_mempool *p)
 	struct rte_distributor *d = wp->dist;
 	unsigned i;
 	struct rte_mbuf *bufs[BURST];
+	unsigned int processed;
 
 	printf("=== Sanity test with mbuf alloc/free (%s) ===\n", wp->name);
 
@@ -316,7 +322,10 @@  sanity_test_with_mbuf_alloc(struct worker_params *wp, struct rte_mempool *p)
 			bufs[j]->hash.usr = (i+j) << 1;
 		}
 
-		rte_distributor_process(d, bufs, BURST);
+		processed = 0;
+		while (processed < BURST)
+			processed += rte_distributor_process(d,
+				&bufs[processed], BURST - processed);
 	}
 
 	rte_distributor_flush(d);
@@ -409,6 +418,7 @@  sanity_test_with_worker_shutdown(struct worker_params *wp,
 	struct rte_mbuf *bufs2[BURST];
 	unsigned int i;
 	unsigned int failed = 0;
+	unsigned int processed = 0;
 
 	printf("=== Sanity test of worker shutdown ===\n");
 
@@ -426,7 +436,10 @@  sanity_test_with_worker_shutdown(struct worker_params *wp,
 	for (i = 0; i < BURST; i++)
 		bufs[i]->hash.usr = 1;
 
-	rte_distributor_process(d, bufs, BURST);
+	processed = 0;
+	while (processed < BURST)
+		processed += rte_distributor_process(d, &bufs[processed],
+			BURST - processed);
 	rte_distributor_flush(d);
 
 	/* at this point, we will have processed some packets and have a full
@@ -488,6 +501,7 @@  test_flush_with_worker_shutdown(struct worker_params *wp,
 	struct rte_mbuf *bufs[BURST];
 	unsigned int i;
 	unsigned int failed = 0;
+	unsigned int processed;
 
 	printf("=== Test flush fn with worker shutdown (%s) ===\n", wp->name);
 
@@ -502,7 +516,10 @@  test_flush_with_worker_shutdown(struct worker_params *wp,
 	for (i = 0; i < BURST; i++)
 		bufs[i]->hash.usr = 0;
 
-	rte_distributor_process(d, bufs, BURST);
+	processed = 0;
+	while (processed < BURST)
+		processed += rte_distributor_process(d, &bufs[processed],
+			BURST - processed);
 	/* at this point, we will have processed some packets and have a full
 	 * backlog for the other ones at worker 0.
 	 */
@@ -584,6 +601,7 @@  sanity_mark_test(struct worker_params *wp, struct rte_mempool *p)
 	unsigned int i, count, id;
 	unsigned int sorted[buf_count], seq;
 	unsigned int failed = 0;
+	unsigned int processed;
 
 	printf("=== Marked packets test ===\n");
 	clear_packet_count();
@@ -614,7 +632,11 @@  sanity_mark_test(struct worker_params *wp, struct rte_mempool *p)
 
 	count = 0;
 	for (i = 0; i < buf_count/burst; i++) {
-		rte_distributor_process(db, &bufs[i * burst], burst);
+		processed = 0;
+		while (processed < burst)
+			processed += rte_distributor_process(db,
+				&bufs[i * burst + processed],
+				burst - processed);
 		count += rte_distributor_returned_pkts(db, &returns[count],
 			buf_count - count);
 	}