[v7,0/3] gro: add UDP/IPv4 GRO and VXLAN UDP/IPv4 GRO support
Message ID | 20200924085740.270192-1-yang_y_yi@163.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68773A04B1; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:57:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE401DD94; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:57:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-m972.mail.163.com (mail-m972.mail.163.com [123.126.97.2]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7046E1DD87 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:57:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=52L0O Z5PAdveFBWxSAym39wyR9VvDXHkd+GJrydSUvc=; b=VL02AqjFAJ0FXNveXzCZo L5DjBJZ7xs6OfKTQu/xs1O12M0GOYPc0EpP+s1gMqF7AzZPoi8NQ4W+JpZ5dnxlO ug2fLzOIwiueuH8dxmEHsCl5ztQA8L+MeSJnZnYWG11fa3x9DTvGrfm/ZxVE4og8 DHK/H1y3v4Ixicwb7kawR8= Received: from yangyi0100.home.langchao.com (unknown [111.207.123.58]) by smtp2 (Coremail) with SMTP id GtxpCgBHQROEX2xfc8QqQw--.19912S2; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:57:42 +0800 (CST) From: yang_y_yi@163.com To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: jiayu.hu@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net, yangyi01@inspur.com, yang_y_yi@163.com Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:57:37 +0800 Message-Id: <20200924085740.270192-1-yang_y_yi@163.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.2.windows.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: GtxpCgBHQROEX2xfc8QqQw--.19912S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoWxXry3ur48Xw4kCr4xZr1kZrb_yoW5Wr1fpa 93Kr4fJrZrJrn3X39xAw40qr95Kr1kJ3W7G347WryxJrs2vw40qrWrKFyfGry7Wr97Jr40 qw1Iq3W3CF1UCFUanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0zRhvttUUUUU= X-Originating-IP: [111.207.123.58] X-CM-SenderInfo: 51dqwsp1b1xqqrwthudrp/xtbBEgepi16iZP9cXgAAsS Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] gro: add UDP/IPv4 GRO and VXLAN UDP/IPv4 GRO support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> |
Message
yang_y_yi
Sept. 24, 2020, 8:57 a.m. UTC
From: Yi Yang <yangyi01@inspur.com>
In case that UFO or GSO is enabled, GRO is very necessary,
especially for UDP, it is more so. Many NICs can't support
VXLAN UDP UFO/USO and VLAN UFO/USO, so UDP performance
improvement depends on GSO and GRO to a great extent.
This patch series added VLAN UDP/IPv4 GRO and VXLAN UDP/IPv4
GRO support.
I have tested it in OVS DPDK, test scenario is as below:
+-------------------------+ +--------------------------+
|VM1 --- OVS DPDK --- NIC1|---| NIC2 --- OVS-DPDK --- VM2|
+-------------------------+ +--------------------------+
SERVER1 SERVER2
If no GSO and GRO, 8k UDP packet can't work in case of UFO or
in case that underlay MTU is 1500, so UDP size must meet MTU
limitation, my VM MTU is 1450 (consider vxlan header), UDP
performance is about 3Gbps, with GSO and GRO enabled, I can
send 8K UDP packet, UDP performance is about 6Gbps (Note: with
small UDP packet loss rate).
FYI: OVS DPDK patch series
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=194621
Changelog
---------
v6 -> v7: correct max_nb_out to left_nb_out in some if statement
add more comments for break branch in gro_*_tbl_timeout_flush
remove whitespace line in struct vxlan_udp4_flow_key
v5 -> v6: add doc update patch for prog_guide and rel_notes
rename udp_check_vxlan_neighbor to udp4_check_vxlan_neighbor
remove outer_ip_id and outer_is_atomic
some other misc changes
v4 -> v5: remove duplicate line
fix header length check issue
add unlikely for some low probability condition branch
rename udp_check_neighbor to udp4_check_neighbor
remove brace for single line else statement
remove outer_l2_len and pkt->outer_l3_len because they
are nonsense for non-VXLAN UDP packet
v3 -> v4: split two patches in cleaner way
remove ip_id which is unnecessary for UDP GRO
correct hdr_len calculation
v2 -> v3: remove UDP header length check
v1 -> v2: split into two patches
Yi Yang (3):
gro: add UDP/IPv4 GRO support
gro: add VXLAN UDP/IPv4 GRO support
doc: update prog_guide and rel_notes for GRO
.../prog_guide/generic_receive_offload_lib.rst | 6 +-
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst | 6 +
lib/librte_gro/gro_udp4.c | 433 ++++++++++++++++
lib/librte_gro/gro_udp4.h | 282 +++++++++++
lib/librte_gro/gro_vxlan_udp4.c | 545 +++++++++++++++++++++
lib/librte_gro/gro_vxlan_udp4.h | 153 ++++++
lib/librte_gro/meson.build | 2 +-
lib/librte_gro/rte_gro.c | 193 ++++++--
lib/librte_gro/rte_gro.h | 8 +-
9 files changed, 1590 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 lib/librte_gro/gro_udp4.c
create mode 100644 lib/librte_gro/gro_udp4.h
create mode 100644 lib/librte_gro/gro_vxlan_udp4.c
create mode 100644 lib/librte_gro/gro_vxlan_udp4.h