| Message ID | 20190412105105.24351-4-g.singh@nxp.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Delegated to: | Ferruh Yigit |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ENETC PMD basic features and bug fixes | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ci/checkpatch | warning | coding style issues |
| ci/Intel-compilation | success | Compilation OK |
diff --git a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c index a31a387..42f16ca 100644 --- a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c +++ b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c @@ -88,8 +88,9 @@ rx_swbd = &rx_ring->q_swbd[i]; rxbd = ENETC_RXBD(*rx_ring, i); for (j = 0; j < buff_cnt; j++) { - rx_swbd->buffer_addr = - rte_cpu_to_le_64(rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(rx_ring->mb_pool)); + rx_swbd->buffer_addr = (void *)(uintptr_t) + rte_cpu_to_le_64((uint64_t)(uintptr_t) + rte_pktmbuf_alloc(rx_ring->mb_pool)); rxbd->w.addr = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t) rx_swbd->buffer_addr->buf_iova + rx_swbd->buffer_addr->data_off;
There was an error at rte_constant_bswap64 while compiling with big endian toolchain. so fixing it by adding type cast. Also, rte_pktmbuf_alloc API should be used to allocate mbuf instead of rte_pktmbuf_raw_alloc to avoid use of stale mbuf information. Fixes: 469c6111a799 ("net/enetc: enable Rx and Tx") Cc: thomas@monjalon.net Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com> --- drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)