Message ID | 20190802212552.8879-1-aconole@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CD61C2EE; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 23:25:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1571C2DA for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 23:25:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86DFC8F030; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 21:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (unknown [10.18.25.67]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66765D712; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 21:25:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Michael Santana <msantana@redhat.com>, David Marchand <dmarchan@redhat.com>, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 17:25:50 -0400 Message-Id: <20190802212552.8879-1-aconole@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190731145030.19956-1-aconole@redhat.com> References: <20190731145030.19956-1-aconole@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Fri, 02 Aug 2019 21:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Enable fast-unit tests under travis X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> |
Series |
Enable fast-unit tests under travis
|
|
Message
Aaron Conole
Aug. 2, 2019, 9:25 p.m. UTC
This series turns the fast unit tests on for a limited set of builds under the travis build system. An example run is available at: https://travis-ci.org/orgcandman/dpdk/builds/565991679 The builds which execute the unit tests may be distinguished by the "RUN_TESTS" parameter. Aaron Conole (1): ci: enable unit tests under travis-ci Michael Santana (1): tests: Fix unit tests for shared builds .ci/linux-build.sh | 8 ++++++++ .ci/linux-setup.sh | 8 +++++++- .travis.yml | 9 ++++++++- app/test/meson.build | 13 +++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
02/08/2019 23:25, Aaron Conole: > This series turns the fast unit tests on for a limited set of > builds under the travis build system. An example run is available > at: > > https://travis-ci.org/orgcandman/dpdk/builds/565991679 > > The builds which execute the unit tests may be distinguished by the > "RUN_TESTS" parameter. > > Aaron Conole (1): > ci: enable unit tests under travis-ci > > Michael Santana (1): > tests: Fix unit tests for shared builds Applied with change in comments of first patch, as described in this thread. Thanks Next step: Get Travis reports in patchwork :)
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:00 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > > 02/08/2019 23:25, Aaron Conole: > > This series turns the fast unit tests on for a limited set of > > builds under the travis build system. An example run is available > > at: > > > > https://travis-ci.org/orgcandman/dpdk/builds/565991679 > > > > The builds which execute the unit tests may be distinguished by the > > "RUN_TESTS" parameter. > > > > Aaron Conole (1): > > ci: enable unit tests under travis-ci > > > > Michael Santana (1): > > tests: Fix unit tests for shared builds > > Applied with change in comments of first patch, as described in this thread. > Thanks Not sure I understand this error: https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222141682 The 'static' config worked fine: https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222141683 Maybe a network issue ? But I would expect some kind of related warning/error message.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:26 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:00 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > > > > 02/08/2019 23:25, Aaron Conole: > > > This series turns the fast unit tests on for a limited set of > > > builds under the travis build system. An example run is available > > > at: > > > > > > https://travis-ci.org/orgcandman/dpdk/builds/565991679 > > > > > > The builds which execute the unit tests may be distinguished by the > > > "RUN_TESTS" parameter. > > > > > > Aaron Conole (1): > > > ci: enable unit tests under travis-ci > > > > > > Michael Santana (1): > > > tests: Fix unit tests for shared builds > > > > Applied with change in comments of first patch, as described in this thread. > > Thanks > > Not sure I understand this error: > https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222141682 > > The 'static' config worked fine: > https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222141683 > > > Maybe a network issue ? But I would expect some kind of related > warning/error message. > Ah something like those messages: https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222407326 https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222417471 Is there a way to retry builds? Automatically?
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:52 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:26 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:00 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > > > > > > 02/08/2019 23:25, Aaron Conole: > > > > This series turns the fast unit tests on for a limited set of > > > > builds under the travis build system. An example run is available > > > > at: > > > > > > > > https://travis-ci.org/orgcandman/dpdk/builds/565991679 > > > > > > > > The builds which execute the unit tests may be distinguished by the > > > > "RUN_TESTS" parameter. > > > > > > > > Aaron Conole (1): > > > > ci: enable unit tests under travis-ci > > > > > > > > Michael Santana (1): > > > > tests: Fix unit tests for shared builds > > > > > > Applied with change in comments of first patch, as described in this thread. > > > Thanks > > > > Not sure I understand this error: > > https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222141682 > > > > The 'static' config worked fine: > > https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222141683 > > > > > > Maybe a network issue ? But I would expect some kind of related > > warning/error message. It's either that or some other issue with the travis infrastructure. There is nothing wrong in our end which is the frustrating part. I am being hopeful and optimistic that it's _just a hiccup_ and it will go away on its own. If it really keeps happening then we might need to report the issue to travis > > > > Ah something like those messages: > https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222407326 > https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222417471 > > Is there a way to retry builds? Yes, at the very top, to the right there is a 'Restart job' button. You have to be logged in as the owner of the repo to be able to see it and click on it. That will restart the job from the very start. > Automatically? That's the million dollar question. We'll have to investigate if it's possible > > > -- > David Marchand
Michael Santana Francisco <msantana@redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:52 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:26 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:00 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: >> > > >> > > 02/08/2019 23:25, Aaron Conole: >> > > > This series turns the fast unit tests on for a limited set of >> > > > builds under the travis build system. An example run is available >> > > > at: >> > > > >> > > > https://travis-ci.org/orgcandman/dpdk/builds/565991679 >> > > > >> > > > The builds which execute the unit tests may be distinguished by the >> > > > "RUN_TESTS" parameter. >> > > > >> > > > Aaron Conole (1): >> > > > ci: enable unit tests under travis-ci >> > > > >> > > > Michael Santana (1): >> > > > tests: Fix unit tests for shared builds >> > > >> > > Applied with change in comments of first patch, as described in this thread. >> > > Thanks >> > >> > Not sure I understand this error: >> > https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222141682 >> > >> > The 'static' config worked fine: >> > https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222141683 >> > >> > >> > Maybe a network issue ? But I would expect some kind of related >> > warning/error message. > It's either that or some other issue with the travis infrastructure. > There is nothing wrong in our end which is the frustrating part. I am > being hopeful and optimistic that it's _just a hiccup_ and it will go > away on its own. If it really keeps happening then we might need to > report the issue to travis >> > >> >> Ah something like those messages: >> https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222407326 >> https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222417471 >> >> Is there a way to retry builds? > Yes, at the very top, to the right there is a 'Restart job' button. > You have to be logged in as the owner of the repo to be able to see it > and click on it. That will restart the job from the very start. >> Automatically? > That's the million dollar question. We'll have to investigate if it's > possible It's possible. I need to get the robot polling travis correctly still. At the moment it can poll, but we don't have enough of the data recorded. It's coming though. One thing I notice is that some of the tests are still failing 'sporadically' and that's difficult to discern. So we might just use the robot as 'warn' rather than 'error' for now and maintainers will have to make a best determination. >> >> >> -- >> David Marchand
05/08/2019 16:18, Aaron Conole: > One thing I notice is that some of the tests are still failing > 'sporadically' and that's difficult to discern. So we might just use > the robot as 'warn' rather than 'error' for now and maintainers will > have to make a best determination. Yes it can be a good first step.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 2:27 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:00 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > > > > 02/08/2019 23:25, Aaron Conole: > > > This series turns the fast unit tests on for a limited set of > > > builds under the travis build system. An example run is available > > > at: > > > > > > https://travis-ci.org/orgcandman/dpdk/builds/565991679 > > > > > > The builds which execute the unit tests may be distinguished by the > > > "RUN_TESTS" parameter. > > > > > > Aaron Conole (1): > > > ci: enable unit tests under travis-ci > > > > > > Michael Santana (1): > > > tests: Fix unit tests for shared builds > > > > Applied with change in comments of first patch, as described in this thread. > > Thanks > > Not sure I understand this error: > https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222141682 > > The 'static' config worked fine: > https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/222141683 > > > Maybe a network issue ? But I would expect some kind of related > warning/error message. It looks like they fixed their network issues https://www.traviscistatus.com/incidents/hl4vqb7hvv5n > > > -- > David Marchand