Message ID | 1613554953-14736-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1E9A054D; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:42:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AC940691; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:42:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from lb.pantheon.sk (lb.pantheon.sk [46.229.239.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625B54067A for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:42:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lb.pantheon.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11782C19EE; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:42:35 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at siecit.sk Received: from lb.pantheon.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lb.pantheon.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iMqlM2k6XQ7m; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:42:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from service-node1.lab.pantheon.local (unknown [46.229.239.141]) by lb.pantheon.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8125CC05C0; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:42:34 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?q?Juraj_Linke=C5=A1?= <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> To: thomas@monjalon.net, david.marchand@redhat.com, aconole@redhat.com, maicolgabriel@hotmail.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, =?utf-8?q?Juraj_Linke=C5=A1?= <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:42:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1613554953-14736-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Travis CI jobs update after credits X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> |
Series |
Travis CI jobs update after credits
|
|
Message
Juraj Linkeš
Feb. 17, 2021, 9:42 a.m. UTC
Since Travis added credits we need to make some changes to the Travis CI. Arm has a credit agreement with Travis for arm jobs, so remove x86 jobs. Also, migrate all arm jobs to the latest environment. Juraj Linkeš (2): ci: remove x86 Travis jobs ci: update arm64 Travis jobs to Graviton2 .travis.yml | 113 ++++++++-------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
Comments
On 2/17/2021 9:42 AM, Juraj Linkeš wrote: > Since Travis added credits we need to make some changes to the Travis > CI. Arm has a credit agreement with Travis for arm jobs, so remove x86 > jobs. Also, migrate all arm jobs to the latest environment. > So this is becoming supporting a CI infrastructure within DPDK for a specific vendor, do we want this? And can't this Travis credit/support be expanded for the whole project, so everyone in the community benefit from it? > Juraj Linkeš (2): > ci: remove x86 Travis jobs > ci: update arm64 Travis jobs to Graviton2 > > .travis.yml | 113 ++++++++-------------------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-) >
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> writes: > On 2/17/2021 9:42 AM, Juraj Linkeš wrote: >> Since Travis added credits we need to make some changes to the Travis >> CI. Arm has a credit agreement with Travis for arm jobs, so remove x86 >> jobs. Also, migrate all arm jobs to the latest environment. >> > > So this is becoming supporting a CI infrastructure within DPDK for a > specific vendor, do we want this? > > And can't this Travis credit/support be expanded for the whole > project, so everyone in the community benefit from it? I agree - it would be best to have it working universally. >> Juraj Linkeš (2): >> ci: remove x86 Travis jobs >> ci: update arm64 Travis jobs to Graviton2 >> >> .travis.yml | 113 ++++++++-------------------------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-) >>
<snip> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Travis CI jobs update after > credits > > Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> writes: > > > On 2/17/2021 9:42 AM, Juraj Linkeš wrote: > >> Since Travis added credits we need to make some changes to the Travis > >> CI. Arm has a credit agreement with Travis for arm jobs, so remove > >> x86 jobs. Also, migrate all arm jobs to the latest environment. > >> > > > > So this is becoming supporting a CI infrastructure within DPDK for a > > specific vendor, do we want this? > > > > And can't this Travis credit/support be expanded for the whole > > project, so everyone in the community benefit from it? > > I agree - it would be best to have it working universally. My understanding is that the credits are not associated with any architecture. > > >> Juraj Linkeš (2): > >> ci: remove x86 Travis jobs > >> ci: update arm64 Travis jobs to Graviton2 > >> > >> .travis.yml | 113 ++++++++-------------------------------------------- > >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-) > >>
<snip> > Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Travis CI jobs update after credits > > Since Travis added credits we need to make some changes to the Travis CI. Arm > has a credit agreement with Travis for arm jobs, so remove x86 jobs. Also, I think there is a mis-understanding here. The credits are for the ovsrobot account and apply to all architectures. > migrate all arm jobs to the latest environment. > > Juraj Linkeš (2): > ci: remove x86 Travis jobs > ci: update arm64 Travis jobs to Graviton2 > > .travis.yml | 113 ++++++++-------------------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1
> -----Original Message----- > From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 3:40 AM > To: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>; thomas@monjalon.net; > david.marchand@redhat.com; aconole@redhat.com; > maicolgabriel@hotmail.com > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; nd > <nd@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; nd > <nd@arm.com> > Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Travis CI jobs update after credits > > <snip> > > > Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Travis CI jobs update after credits > > > > Since Travis added credits we need to make some changes to the Travis > > CI. Arm has a credit agreement with Travis for arm jobs, so remove x86 > > jobs. Also, > I think there is a mis-understanding here. The credits are for the ovsrobot > account and apply to all architectures. > This is likely my mistake. I thought there would only be enough credits to run just arm jobs. It seems there are enough credits to run everything, so I'll drop this patch. > > migrate all arm jobs to the latest environment. > > > > Juraj Linkeš (2): > > ci: remove x86 Travis jobs > > ci: update arm64 Travis jobs to Graviton2 > > > > .travis.yml | 113 > > ++++++++-------------------------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.20.1