[v2,2/2] net/mlx5: fix Rx descriptor status returned value

Message ID 20201112153911.15044-3-maxime.leroy@6wind.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Raslan Darawsheh
Headers
Series net/mlx5: fixes for rx queue count calculation |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-testing success Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/iol-intel-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/travis-robot success Travis build: passed
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS

Commit Message

Maxime Leroy Nov. 12, 2020, 3:39 p.m. UTC
  From: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>

One entry may contain several segments, so 'used' must be multiplied
by number of segments per entry to properly reflect the queue usage.

Fixes: 8788fec1f269 ("net/mlx5: implement descriptor status API")
Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Leroy <maxime.leroy@6wind.com>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Slava Ovsiienko Nov. 13, 2020, 2:03 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi, Maxime

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Leroy <maxime.leroy@6wind.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 17:39
> To: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>;
> Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Olivier Matz
> <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] net/mlx5: fix Rx descriptor status returned value
> 
> From: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>
> 
> One entry may contain several segments, so 'used' must be multiplied by
> number of segments per entry to properly reflect the queue usage.
> 
> Fixes: 8788fec1f269 ("net/mlx5: implement descriptor status API")
> Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Leroy <maxime.leroy@6wind.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c index
> 2733dcd3..f390dd66 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c
> @@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ rx_queue_count(struct mlx5_rxq_data *rxq)
>  	struct rxq_zip *zip = &rxq->zip;
>  	volatile struct mlx5_cqe *cqe;
>  	const unsigned int cqe_n = (1 << rxq->cqe_n);
> +	const unsigned int sges_n = (1 << rxq->sges_n);
>  	const unsigned int cqe_cnt = cqe_n - 1;
>  	unsigned int cq_ci, used;
> 
> @@ -488,7 +489,7 @@ rx_queue_count(struct mlx5_rxq_data *rxq)
>  		used += n;
>  		cqe = &(*rxq->cqes)[cq_ci & cqe_cnt];
>  	}
> -	used = RTE_MIN(used, cqe_n);
> +	used = RTE_MIN(used * sges_n, cqe_n);

cqe_n reflects the number of the data descriptors in the RxQ, there might be convergency.
I suppose the clamping should be:
- for non-MPRQ rx_burst (regular and vectorized)  - (1 <<rxq->elts_n)
- for MPRQ (1 <<rxq->elts_n) * (1 << rxq->strd_n)

For non-MPRQ the rxq->strd_n is zero,  hence, it could look like:

used = RTE_MIN(used * sges_n, (1 <<rxq->elts_n) * (1 << rxq->strd_n));

With best regards,
Slava
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c
index 2733dcd3..f390dd66 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c
@@ -463,6 +463,7 @@  rx_queue_count(struct mlx5_rxq_data *rxq)
 	struct rxq_zip *zip = &rxq->zip;
 	volatile struct mlx5_cqe *cqe;
 	const unsigned int cqe_n = (1 << rxq->cqe_n);
+	const unsigned int sges_n = (1 << rxq->sges_n);
 	const unsigned int cqe_cnt = cqe_n - 1;
 	unsigned int cq_ci, used;
 
@@ -488,7 +489,7 @@  rx_queue_count(struct mlx5_rxq_data *rxq)
 		used += n;
 		cqe = &(*rxq->cqes)[cq_ci & cqe_cnt];
 	}
-	used = RTE_MIN(used, cqe_n);
+	used = RTE_MIN(used * sges_n, cqe_n);
 	return used;
 }