[2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure in rcu qsbr perf

Message ID 20201029153634.10647-2-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: David Marchand
Headers
Series [1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK

Commit Message

Dharmik Thakkar Oct. 29, 2020, 3:36 p.m. UTC
  Return error if Add/Delete fail in multiwriter perf test

Fixes: eff30b59cc2e ("test/lpm: add RCU performance tests")
Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
 app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
  

Patch

diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
index 0a2d76a983c3..251ea12345ae 100644
--- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
@@ -453,6 +453,8 @@  test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)
 					next_hop_add) != 0) {
 				printf("Failed to add iteration %d, route# %d\n",
 					i, j);
+				pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
+				return -1;
 			}
 			pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
 		}
@@ -464,6 +466,8 @@  test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)
 				large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth) != 0) {
 				printf("Failed to delete iteration %d, route# %d\n",
 					i, j);
+				pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
+				return -1;
 			}
 			pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
 		}