From patchwork Thu Jul 2 04:11:25 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ajit Khaparde X-Patchwork-Id: 72762 X-Patchwork-Delegate: ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A5AA0523; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 06:20:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB031D728; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 06:12:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rnd-relay.smtp.broadcom.com (rnd-relay.smtp.broadcom.com [192.19.229.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8191C440 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 06:11:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-irv-17.broadcom.com (mail-irv-17.lvn.broadcom.net [10.75.242.48]) by rnd-relay.smtp.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08E230C0B1; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 21:11:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 rnd-relay.smtp.broadcom.com D08E230C0B1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=broadcom.com; s=dkimrelay; t=1593663110; bh=cEfGl7CCKOVwcMXGTDNXlGigKTsWYMeON5L4IqlO8PA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Lvy5PAOH8m7VCK1hnm0c2nY/qBNVfDUYkGnrtdTPOqJxGTzfn0ww10js6PKlvePqU 6JAJPTjP/iKqmtH3yhX2HWcTFfdpap4OEbrXNz7DTXwXhsQ1VvxDwWI5fx4BwTCdtG wcAGVFk/9HpGtapmK1RwcpaYHNwUDneIHZd3qGEc= Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.230.185.215]) by mail-irv-17.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523EE14008B; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 21:11:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Ajit Khaparde To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Venkat Duvvuru , Somnath Kotur Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 21:11:25 -0700 Message-Id: <20200702041134.43198-43-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.1 (Apple Git-122.3) In-Reply-To: <20200702041134.43198-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> References: <1f5421dc-0453-6dc8-09c2-ddfff6eb4888@intel.com> <20200702041134.43198-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 42/51] net/bnxt: manage VF to VFR conduit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" From: Venkat Duvvuru When VF-VFR conduits are created, a mark is added to the mark database. mark_flag indicates whether the mark is valid and has VFR information (VFR_ID bit in mark_flag). Rx path was checking for this VFR_ID bit. However, while adding the mark to the mark database, VFR_ID bit is not set in mark_flag. Signed-off-by: Venkat Duvvuru Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur Reviewed-by: Ajit Khaparde --- drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_mark_mgr.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_mark_mgr.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_mark_mgr.c index b3527eccb..b2c8c349c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_mark_mgr.c +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_mark_mgr.c @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ BNXT_ULP_MARK_VALID) #define ULP_MARK_DB_ENTRY_IS_INVALID(mark_info) (!((mark_info)->flags &\ BNXT_ULP_MARK_VALID)) +#define ULP_MARK_DB_ENTRY_SET_VFR_ID(mark_info) ((mark_info)->flags |=\ + BNXT_ULP_MARK_VFR_ID) #define ULP_MARK_DB_ENTRY_IS_VFR_ID(mark_info) ((mark_info)->flags &\ BNXT_ULP_MARK_VFR_ID) #define ULP_MARK_DB_ENTRY_IS_GLOBAL_HW_FID(mark_info) ((mark_info)->flags &\ @@ -263,6 +265,9 @@ ulp_mark_db_mark_add(struct bnxt_ulp_context *ctxt, BNXT_TF_DBG(DEBUG, "Set LFID[0x%0x] = 0x%0x\n", fid, mark); mtbl->lfid_tbl[fid].mark_id = mark; ULP_MARK_DB_ENTRY_SET_VALID(&mtbl->lfid_tbl[fid]); + + if (mark_flag & BNXT_ULP_MARK_VFR_ID) + ULP_MARK_DB_ENTRY_SET_VFR_ID(&mtbl->lfid_tbl[fid]); } return 0;