diff mbox series

[v3,3/4] net/ice: support switch flow for specific L4 type

Message ID 20200628050145.72810-4-wei.zhao1@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Qi Zhang
Headers
Series [v3,1/4] net/ice: add support more PPPoE packet type for switch |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK

Commit Message

Zhao1, Wei June 28, 2020, 5:01 a.m. UTC 
  This patch add more specific tunnel type for ipv4/ipv6 packet,
it enable tcp/udp layer of ipv4/ipv6 as L4 payload but without
L4 dst/src port number as input set for the switch filter rule.

Fixes: 47d460d63233 ("net/ice: rework switch filter")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Qi Zhang June 29, 2020, 1:55 a.m. UTC | #1 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2020 1:02 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Lu, Nannan
> <nannan.lu@intel.com>; Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] net/ice: support switch flow for specific L4 type
> 
> This patch add more specific tunnel type for ipv4/ipv6 packet, it enable
> tcp/udp layer of ipv4/ipv6 as L4 payload but without
> L4 dst/src port number as input set for the switch filter rule.
> 
> Fixes: 47d460d63233 ("net/ice: rework switch filter")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> b/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> index c607e8d17..c1ea74c73 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
>  #define ICE_PPP_IPV4_PROTO	0x0021
>  #define ICE_PPP_IPV6_PROTO	0x0057
>  #define ICE_IPV4_PROTO_NVGRE	0x002F
> +#define ICE_TUN_VXLAN_VALID	0x0001
> +#define ICE_TUN_NVGRE_VALID	0x0002

Why not apply the same pattern with other valid flag?
I mean use vxlan_valid and nvgre_valid.
Could be tunnel_valid = vxlan_valid | nvgre_valid.

> 
>  #define ICE_SW_INSET_ETHER ( \
>  	ICE_INSET_DMAC | ICE_INSET_SMAC | ICE_INSET_ETHERTYPE) @@
> -471,11 +473,11 @@ ice_switch_inset_get(const struct rte_flow_item
> pattern[],
>  	const struct rte_flow_item_l2tpv3oip *l2tp_spec, *l2tp_mask;
>  	const struct rte_flow_item_pfcp *pfcp_spec, *pfcp_mask;
>  	uint64_t input_set = ICE_INSET_NONE;
> +	uint16_t tunnel_valid = 0;
>  	bool pppoe_elem_valid = 0;
>  	bool pppoe_patt_valid = 0;
>  	bool pppoe_prot_valid = 0;
>  	bool profile_rule = 0;
> -	bool tunnel_valid = 0;
>  	bool ipv6_valiad = 0;
>  	bool ipv4_valiad = 0;
>  	bool udp_valiad = 0;
> @@ -924,7 +926,7 @@ ice_switch_inset_get(const struct rte_flow_item
> pattern[],
>  				return 0;
>  			}
> 
> -			tunnel_valid = 1;
> +			tunnel_valid = ICE_TUN_VXLAN_VALID;
>  			if (vxlan_spec && vxlan_mask) {
>  				list[t].type = ICE_VXLAN;
>  				if (vxlan_mask->vni[0] ||
> @@ -960,7 +962,7 @@ ice_switch_inset_get(const struct rte_flow_item
> pattern[],
>  					   "Invalid NVGRE item");
>  				return 0;
>  			}
> -			tunnel_valid = 1;
> +			tunnel_valid = ICE_TUN_NVGRE_VALID;
>  			if (nvgre_spec && nvgre_mask) {
>  				list[t].type = ICE_NVGRE;
>  				if (nvgre_mask->tni[0] ||
> @@ -1325,6 +1327,21 @@ ice_switch_inset_get(const struct rte_flow_item
> pattern[],
>  			*tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_PPPOE;
>  	}
> 
> +	if (*tun_type == ICE_NON_TUN) {
> +		if (tunnel_valid == ICE_TUN_VXLAN_VALID)
> +			*tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_VXLAN;
> +		else if (tunnel_valid == ICE_TUN_NVGRE_VALID)
> +			*tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_NVGRE;
> +		else if (ipv4_valiad && tcp_valiad)
> +			*tun_type = ICE_SW_IPV4_TCP;
> +		else if (ipv4_valiad && udp_valiad)
> +			*tun_type = ICE_SW_IPV4_UDP;
> +		else if (ipv6_valiad && tcp_valiad)
> +			*tun_type = ICE_SW_IPV6_TCP;
> +		else if (ipv6_valiad && udp_valiad)
> +			*tun_type = ICE_SW_IPV6_UDP;
> +	}
> +
>  	*lkups_num = t;
> 
>  	return input_set;
> @@ -1536,10 +1553,6 @@ ice_switch_parse_pattern_action(struct
> ice_adapter *ad,
> 
>  	for (; item->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END; item++) {
>  		item_num++;
> -		if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN)
> -			tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_VXLAN;
> -		if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_NVGRE)
> -			tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_NVGRE;
>  		if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH) {
>  			const struct rte_flow_item_eth *eth_mask;
>  			if (item->mask)
> --
> 2.19.1
Zhao1, Wei June 29, 2020, 2:01 a.m. UTC | #2 
Hi, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 9:56 AM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Lu, Nannan <nannan.lu@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/4] net/ice: support switch flow for specific L4 type
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2020 1:02 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Lu, Nannan
> > <nannan.lu@intel.com>; Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] net/ice: support switch flow for specific L4
> > type
> >
> > This patch add more specific tunnel type for ipv4/ipv6 packet, it
> > enable tcp/udp layer of ipv4/ipv6 as L4 payload but without
> > L4 dst/src port number as input set for the switch filter rule.
> >
> > Fixes: 47d460d63233 ("net/ice: rework switch filter")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> > b/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> > index c607e8d17..c1ea74c73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> >  #define ICE_PPP_IPV4_PROTO	0x0021
> >  #define ICE_PPP_IPV6_PROTO	0x0057
> >  #define ICE_IPV4_PROTO_NVGRE	0x002F
> > +#define ICE_TUN_VXLAN_VALID	0x0001
> > +#define ICE_TUN_NVGRE_VALID	0x0002
> 
> Why not apply the same pattern with other valid flag?
> I mean use vxlan_valid and nvgre_valid.
> Could be tunnel_valid = vxlan_valid | nvgre_valid.

Because we will extend to gtp-u or other kinds of packet, there will be more and more xxx_valid variable.
I think we can follow rte layer to use bit define kinds of tunnel packet.
It is too complex to define too many valid flag.

> 
> >
> >  #define ICE_SW_INSET_ETHER ( \
> >  	ICE_INSET_DMAC | ICE_INSET_SMAC | ICE_INSET_ETHERTYPE) @@
> > -471,11 +473,11 @@ ice_switch_inset_get(const struct rte_flow_item
> > pattern[],
> >  	const struct rte_flow_item_l2tpv3oip *l2tp_spec, *l2tp_mask;
> >  	const struct rte_flow_item_pfcp *pfcp_spec, *pfcp_mask;
> >  	uint64_t input_set = ICE_INSET_NONE;
> > +	uint16_t tunnel_valid = 0;
> >  	bool pppoe_elem_valid = 0;
> >  	bool pppoe_patt_valid = 0;
> >  	bool pppoe_prot_valid = 0;
> >  	bool profile_rule = 0;
> > -	bool tunnel_valid = 0;
> >  	bool ipv6_valiad = 0;
> >  	bool ipv4_valiad = 0;
> >  	bool udp_valiad = 0;
> > @@ -924,7 +926,7 @@ ice_switch_inset_get(const struct rte_flow_item
> > pattern[],
> >  				return 0;
> >  			}
> >
> > -			tunnel_valid = 1;
> > +			tunnel_valid = ICE_TUN_VXLAN_VALID;
> >  			if (vxlan_spec && vxlan_mask) {
> >  				list[t].type = ICE_VXLAN;
> >  				if (vxlan_mask->vni[0] ||
> > @@ -960,7 +962,7 @@ ice_switch_inset_get(const struct rte_flow_item
> > pattern[],
> >  					   "Invalid NVGRE item");
> >  				return 0;
> >  			}
> > -			tunnel_valid = 1;
> > +			tunnel_valid = ICE_TUN_NVGRE_VALID;
> >  			if (nvgre_spec && nvgre_mask) {
> >  				list[t].type = ICE_NVGRE;
> >  				if (nvgre_mask->tni[0] ||
> > @@ -1325,6 +1327,21 @@ ice_switch_inset_get(const struct rte_flow_item
> > pattern[],
> >  			*tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_PPPOE;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	if (*tun_type == ICE_NON_TUN) {
> > +		if (tunnel_valid == ICE_TUN_VXLAN_VALID)
> > +			*tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_VXLAN;
> > +		else if (tunnel_valid == ICE_TUN_NVGRE_VALID)
> > +			*tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_NVGRE;
> > +		else if (ipv4_valiad && tcp_valiad)
> > +			*tun_type = ICE_SW_IPV4_TCP;
> > +		else if (ipv4_valiad && udp_valiad)
> > +			*tun_type = ICE_SW_IPV4_UDP;
> > +		else if (ipv6_valiad && tcp_valiad)
> > +			*tun_type = ICE_SW_IPV6_TCP;
> > +		else if (ipv6_valiad && udp_valiad)
> > +			*tun_type = ICE_SW_IPV6_UDP;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	*lkups_num = t;
> >
> >  	return input_set;
> > @@ -1536,10 +1553,6 @@ ice_switch_parse_pattern_action(struct
> > ice_adapter *ad,
> >
> >  	for (; item->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END; item++) {
> >  		item_num++;
> > -		if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN)
> > -			tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_VXLAN;
> > -		if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_NVGRE)
> > -			tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_NVGRE;
> >  		if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH) {
> >  			const struct rte_flow_item_eth *eth_mask;
> >  			if (item->mask)
> > --
> > 2.19.1
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
index c607e8d17..c1ea74c73 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ 
 #define ICE_PPP_IPV4_PROTO	0x0021
 #define ICE_PPP_IPV6_PROTO	0x0057
 #define ICE_IPV4_PROTO_NVGRE	0x002F
+#define ICE_TUN_VXLAN_VALID	0x0001
+#define ICE_TUN_NVGRE_VALID	0x0002
 
 #define ICE_SW_INSET_ETHER ( \
 	ICE_INSET_DMAC | ICE_INSET_SMAC | ICE_INSET_ETHERTYPE)
@@ -471,11 +473,11 @@  ice_switch_inset_get(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
 	const struct rte_flow_item_l2tpv3oip *l2tp_spec, *l2tp_mask;
 	const struct rte_flow_item_pfcp *pfcp_spec, *pfcp_mask;
 	uint64_t input_set = ICE_INSET_NONE;
+	uint16_t tunnel_valid = 0;
 	bool pppoe_elem_valid = 0;
 	bool pppoe_patt_valid = 0;
 	bool pppoe_prot_valid = 0;
 	bool profile_rule = 0;
-	bool tunnel_valid = 0;
 	bool ipv6_valiad = 0;
 	bool ipv4_valiad = 0;
 	bool udp_valiad = 0;
@@ -924,7 +926,7 @@  ice_switch_inset_get(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
 				return 0;
 			}
 
-			tunnel_valid = 1;
+			tunnel_valid = ICE_TUN_VXLAN_VALID;
 			if (vxlan_spec && vxlan_mask) {
 				list[t].type = ICE_VXLAN;
 				if (vxlan_mask->vni[0] ||
@@ -960,7 +962,7 @@  ice_switch_inset_get(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
 					   "Invalid NVGRE item");
 				return 0;
 			}
-			tunnel_valid = 1;
+			tunnel_valid = ICE_TUN_NVGRE_VALID;
 			if (nvgre_spec && nvgre_mask) {
 				list[t].type = ICE_NVGRE;
 				if (nvgre_mask->tni[0] ||
@@ -1325,6 +1327,21 @@  ice_switch_inset_get(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
 			*tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_PPPOE;
 	}
 
+	if (*tun_type == ICE_NON_TUN) {
+		if (tunnel_valid == ICE_TUN_VXLAN_VALID)
+			*tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_VXLAN;
+		else if (tunnel_valid == ICE_TUN_NVGRE_VALID)
+			*tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_NVGRE;
+		else if (ipv4_valiad && tcp_valiad)
+			*tun_type = ICE_SW_IPV4_TCP;
+		else if (ipv4_valiad && udp_valiad)
+			*tun_type = ICE_SW_IPV4_UDP;
+		else if (ipv6_valiad && tcp_valiad)
+			*tun_type = ICE_SW_IPV6_TCP;
+		else if (ipv6_valiad && udp_valiad)
+			*tun_type = ICE_SW_IPV6_UDP;
+	}
+
 	*lkups_num = t;
 
 	return input_set;
@@ -1536,10 +1553,6 @@  ice_switch_parse_pattern_action(struct ice_adapter *ad,
 
 	for (; item->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END; item++) {
 		item_num++;
-		if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN)
-			tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_VXLAN;
-		if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_NVGRE)
-			tun_type = ICE_SW_TUN_NVGRE;
 		if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH) {
 			const struct rte_flow_item_eth *eth_mask;
 			if (item->mask)