[v5,2/4] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct benchmarking

Message ID 1547548354-44671-3-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Thomas Monjalon
Headers show
  • spinlock optimization and test case enhancements
Related show


Context Check Description
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK

Commit Message

Gavin Hu Jan. 15, 2019, 10:32 a.m.
From: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>

The test is to benchmark the performance of spinlock by counting the
number of spinlock acquire and release operations within the specified
A typical pair of lock and unlock operations costs tens or hundreds of
nano seconds, in comparison to this, delaying 1 us outside of the locked
region is too much, compromising the goal of benchmarking the lock and
unlock performance.

Signed-off-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Joyce Kong <Joyce.Kong@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
 test/test/test_spinlock.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)


diff --git a/test/test/test_spinlock.c b/test/test/test_spinlock.c
index 73bff12..6795195 100644
--- a/test/test/test_spinlock.c
+++ b/test/test/test_spinlock.c
@@ -120,8 +120,6 @@  load_loop_fn(void *func_param)
 		if (use_lock)
-		/* delay to make lock duty cycle slighlty realistic */
-		rte_delay_us(1);
 		time_diff = rte_get_timer_cycles() - begin;
 	lock_count[lcore] = lcount;