From patchwork Fri Dec 14 19:01:53 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rahul Lakkireddy X-Patchwork-Id: 48927 X-Patchwork-Delegate: ferruh.yigit@amd.com Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6FC1B9CD; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 20:03:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from stargate.chelsio.com (stargate.chelsio.com [12.32.117.8]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75E61B9C7; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 20:03:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (scalar.blr.asicdesigners.com [10.193.185.94]) by stargate.chelsio.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wBEJ3WOb016126; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:03:33 -0800 From: Rahul Lakkireddy To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: nirranjan@chelsio.com, indranil@chelsio.com, stable@dpdk.org Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 00:31:53 +0530 Message-Id: <249b1185353b73d8c3c8aa8399af03957c9cd5cd.1544813681.git.rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.3 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/cxgbe: fix overlapping regions in TID table X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Location of filter TID table should be after active TID table memory, and not from the beginning of TID table memory. This fixes memory corruption due to overlapping regions. Fixes: 3a381a4116ed ("net/cxgbe: query firmware for HASH filter resources") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Rahul Lakkireddy --- drivers/net/cxgbe/cxgbe_main.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/cxgbe/cxgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/cxgbe/cxgbe_main.c index 0368db509..5fa6cdd05 100644 --- a/drivers/net/cxgbe/cxgbe_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/cxgbe/cxgbe_main.c @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static int tid_init(struct tid_info *t) return -ENOMEM; t->atid_tab = (union aopen_entry *)&t->tid_tab[t->ntids]; - t->ftid_tab = (struct filter_entry *)&t->tid_tab[t->natids]; + t->ftid_tab = (struct filter_entry *)&t->atid_tab[t->natids]; t->ftid_bmap_array = t4_os_alloc(ftid_bmap_size); if (!t->ftid_bmap_array) { tid_free(t);