[dpdk-dev,v3] mempool: remove a redundant word "for" in comment
Checks
Commit Message
There is a redundant repetition word "for" in commnet line of the
file rte_mempool.h after the definition of RTE_MEMPOOL_OPS_NAMESIZE.
The word "for"appear twice in line 359 and 360. One of them is
redundant, so delete it.
Fixes: 449c49b93a6b ("mempool: support handler operations")
Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
---
v3:
--checkpatch warnings fixed
v2:
--checkpatch errors fixed
---
lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
2016-12-05 11:40, Wei Zhao:
> There is a redundant repetition word "for" in commnet line of the
> file rte_mempool.h after the definition of RTE_MEMPOOL_OPS_NAMESIZE.
> The word "for"appear twice in line 359 and 360. One of them is
> redundant, so delete it.
>
> Fixes: 449c49b93a6b ("mempool: support handler operations")
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Applied (with small typos fixed in message), thanks
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ void rte_mempool_check_cookies(const struct rte_mempool *mp,
* Prototype for implementation specific data provisioning function.
*
* The function should provide the implementation specific memory for
- * for use by the other mempool ops functions in a given mempool ops struct.
+ * use by the other mempool ops functions in a given mempool ops struct.
* E.g. the default ops provides an instance of the rte_ring for this purpose.
* it will most likely point to a different type of data structure, and
* will be transparent to the application programmer.