[dpdk-dev,v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
Checks
Commit Message
From: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
function i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr without check return value of rte_zmalloc
Fixes: 97ac72aa71a9 ("i40e: support setting VF MAC address ")
Signed-off-by: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
---
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Comments
> -----Original Message-----
> From: henry [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 9:20 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; zhoujingbin@huawei.com; henry cai
> Subject: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>
> From: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
>
> function i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr without check return value of
> rte_zmalloc
>
> Fixes: 97ac72aa71a9 ("i40e: support setting VF MAC address ")
>
> Signed-off-by: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> index d3659c9..3e0e2e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> @@ -2016,6 +2016,10 @@ static int i40evf_dev_xstats_get(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> }
>
> list = rte_zmalloc("i40evf_del_mac_buffer", len, 0);
> + if (!list) {
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "fail to allocate memory");
> + return;
> + }
>
> for (i = begin; i < next_begin; i++) {
> addr = &dev->data->mac_addrs[i];
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Do you have any idea to fix the patch check warning, this is already the perfect way?
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com]
发送时间: 2017年4月5日 23:34
收件人: caihe
抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
主题: RE: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
> -----Original Message-----
> From: henry [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 9:20 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; zhoujingbin@huawei.com; henry cai
> Subject: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>
> From: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
>
> function i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr without check return value of
> rte_zmalloc
>
> Fixes: 97ac72aa71a9 ("i40e: support setting VF MAC address ")
>
> Signed-off-by: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> index d3659c9..3e0e2e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> @@ -2016,6 +2016,10 @@ static int i40evf_dev_xstats_get(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev,
> }
>
> list = rte_zmalloc("i40evf_del_mac_buffer", len, 0);
> + if (!list) {
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "fail to allocate memory");
> + return;
> + }
>
> for (i = begin; i < next_begin; i++) {
> addr = &dev->data->mac_addrs[i];
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: caihe [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 9:06 AM
> To: Zhang, Helin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
> Subject: 答复: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>
> Do you have any idea to fix the patch check warning, this is already the perfect
> way?
Basically we use Linux script tool of checkpatch.pl to check the patch before sending it out.
But what's the issue you mentioned above? I don't see anything.
Thanks,
Helin
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com]
> 发送时间: 2017年4月5日 23:34
> 收件人: caihe
> 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
> 主题: RE: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: henry [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 9:20 PM
> > To: Zhang, Helin
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; zhoujingbin@huawei.com; henry cai
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
> >
> > From: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
> >
> > function i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr without check return value of
> > rte_zmalloc
> >
> > Fixes: 97ac72aa71a9 ("i40e: support setting VF MAC address ")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > index d3659c9..3e0e2e1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > @@ -2016,6 +2016,10 @@ static int i40evf_dev_xstats_get(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > }
> >
> > list = rte_zmalloc("i40evf_del_mac_buffer", len, 0);
> > + if (!list) {
> > + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "fail to allocate memory");
> > + return;
> > + }
> >
> > for (i = begin; i < next_begin; i++) {
> > addr = &dev->data->mac_addrs[i];
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
The warning as below:
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
#6:
function i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr without check return value of rte_zmalloc
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 10 lines checked
And the waring line content is:
+ PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "fail to allocate memory");
I have no idea how to fix it, and have tried some alternative ways to avoid the warning, but fails with another different warning.
I even doubt some configurations is wrong in my local environment, so I post the patch, but fail with the same warning.
Could you offer some advice to avoid this warning, else we should avoid this warning with another different patch?
Thanks
Henry
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com]
发送时间: 2017年4月6日 14:35
收件人: caihe
抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
主题: RE: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
> -----Original Message-----
> From: caihe [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 9:06 AM
> To: Zhang, Helin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
> Subject: 答复: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>
> Do you have any idea to fix the patch check warning, this is already
> the perfect way?
Basically we use Linux script tool of checkpatch.pl to check the patch before sending it out.
But what's the issue you mentioned above? I don't see anything.
Thanks,
Helin
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com]
> 发送时间: 2017年4月5日 23:34
> 收件人: caihe
> 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
> 主题: RE: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: henry [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 9:20 PM
> > To: Zhang, Helin
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; zhoujingbin@huawei.com; henry cai
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
> >
> > From: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
> >
> > function i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr without check return value of
> > rte_zmalloc
> >
> > Fixes: 97ac72aa71a9 ("i40e: support setting VF MAC address ")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > index d3659c9..3e0e2e1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > @@ -2016,6 +2016,10 @@ static int i40evf_dev_xstats_get(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > }
> >
> > list = rte_zmalloc("i40evf_del_mac_buffer", len, 0);
> > + if (!list) {
> > + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "fail to allocate memory");
> > + return;
> > + }
> >
> > for (i = begin; i < next_begin; i++) {
> > addr = &dev->data->mac_addrs[i];
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
Hi Henry
I don't know why.
Hi Ferruh
Do you have any idea on this warning? Does Henry need to fix that?
Regards,
Helin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: caihe [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 3:27 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
> Subject: 答复: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>
> The warning as below:
> WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75
> chars per line)
> #6:
> function i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr without check return value of
> rte_zmalloc
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 10 lines checked
>
> And the waring line content is:
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "fail to allocate memory");
>
> I have no idea how to fix it, and have tried some alternative ways to avoid the
> warning, but fails with another different warning.
> I even doubt some configurations is wrong in my local environment, so I post
> the patch, but fail with the same warning.
>
> Could you offer some advice to avoid this warning, else we should avoid this
> warning with another different patch?
>
> Thanks
> Henry
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com]
> 发送时间: 2017年4月6日 14:35
> 收件人: caihe
> 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
> 主题: RE: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: caihe [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 9:06 AM
> > To: Zhang, Helin
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
> > Subject: 答复: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
> >
> > Do you have any idea to fix the patch check warning, this is already
> > the perfect way?
> Basically we use Linux script tool of checkpatch.pl to check the patch before
> sending it out.
> But what's the issue you mentioned above? I don't see anything.
>
> Thanks,
> Helin
> >
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com]
> > 发送时间: 2017年4月5日 23:34
> > 收件人: caihe
> > 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
> > 主题: RE: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: henry [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 9:20 PM
> > > To: Zhang, Helin
> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; zhoujingbin@huawei.com; henry cai
> > > Subject: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
> > >
> > > From: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
> > >
> > > function i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr without check return value of
> > > rte_zmalloc
> > >
> > > Fixes: 97ac72aa71a9 ("i40e: support setting VF MAC address ")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
> > Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 4 ++++
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > > index d3659c9..3e0e2e1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > > @@ -2016,6 +2016,10 @@ static int i40evf_dev_xstats_get(struct
> > > rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > > }
> > >
> > > list = rte_zmalloc("i40evf_del_mac_buffer", len, 0);
> > > + if (!list) {
> > > + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "fail to allocate memory");
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > for (i = begin; i < next_begin; i++) {
> > > addr = &dev->data->mac_addrs[i];
> > > --
> > > 1.8.3.1
> > >
On 4/6/2017 9:27 AM, Zhang, Helin wrote:
> Hi Henry
>
> I don't know why.
>
> Hi Ferruh
>
> Do you have any idea on this warning? Does Henry need to fix that?
That is because commit log has a long line, line should be less than
72chars. I can fix it while applying.
Thanks,
ferruh
>
> Regards,
> Helin
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: caihe [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 3:27 PM
>> To: Zhang, Helin
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
>> Subject: 答复: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>>
>> The warning as below:
>> WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75
>> chars per line)
>> #6:
>> function i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr without check return value of
>> rte_zmalloc
>>
>> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 10 lines checked
>>
>> And the waring line content is:
>> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "fail to allocate memory");
>>
>> I have no idea how to fix it, and have tried some alternative ways to avoid the
>> warning, but fails with another different warning.
>> I even doubt some configurations is wrong in my local environment, so I post
>> the patch, but fail with the same warning.
>>
>> Could you offer some advice to avoid this warning, else we should avoid this
>> warning with another different patch?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Henry
>>
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com]
>> 发送时间: 2017年4月6日 14:35
>> 收件人: caihe
>> 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
>> 主题: RE: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: caihe [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 9:06 AM
>>> To: Zhang, Helin
>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
>>> Subject: 答复: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>>>
>>> Do you have any idea to fix the patch check warning, this is already
>>> the perfect way?
>> Basically we use Linux script tool of checkpatch.pl to check the patch before
>> sending it out.
>> But what's the issue you mentioned above? I don't see anything.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Helin
>>>
>>> -----邮件原件-----
>>> 发件人: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com]
>>> 发送时间: 2017年4月5日 23:34
>>> 收件人: caihe
>>> 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
>>> 主题: RE: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: henry [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 9:20 PM
>>>> To: Zhang, Helin
>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; zhoujingbin@huawei.com; henry cai
>>>> Subject: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>>>>
>>>> From: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
>>>>
>>>> function i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr without check return value of
>>>> rte_zmalloc
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 97ac72aa71a9 ("i40e: support setting VF MAC address ")
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
>>> Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 4 ++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
>>>> index d3659c9..3e0e2e1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
>>>> @@ -2016,6 +2016,10 @@ static int i40evf_dev_xstats_get(struct
>>>> rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> list = rte_zmalloc("i40evf_del_mac_buffer", len, 0);
>>>> + if (!list) {
>>>> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "fail to allocate memory");
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> for (i = begin; i < next_begin; i++) {
>>>> addr = &dev->data->mac_addrs[i];
>>>> --
>>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>>
>
On 4/5/2017 4:34 PM, Zhang, Helin wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: henry [mailto:caihe@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 9:20 PM
>> To: Zhang, Helin
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; zhoujingbin@huawei.com; henry cai
>> Subject: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
>>
>> From: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
>>
>> function i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr without check return value of
>> rte_zmalloc
>>
>> Fixes: 97ac72aa71a9 ("i40e: support setting VF MAC address ")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: henry cai <caihe@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Henry Cai <caihe@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.
@@ -2016,6 +2016,10 @@ static int i40evf_dev_xstats_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
}
list = rte_zmalloc("i40evf_del_mac_buffer", len, 0);
+ if (!list) {
+ PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "fail to allocate memory");
+ return;
+ }
for (i = begin; i < next_begin; i++) {
addr = &dev->data->mac_addrs[i];