net/mlx5: fix matcher metadata register c0 field setup

Message ID 1576828138-13063-1-git-send-email-viacheslavo@mellanox.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Raslan Darawsheh
Headers
Series net/mlx5: fix matcher metadata register c0 field setup |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/iol-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/travis-robot warning Travis build: failed
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK

Commit Message

Slava Ovsiienko Dec. 20, 2019, 7:48 a.m. UTC
  The metadata register c0 field in the matcher might be split
into two independent fields - the source vport index and META
item value. These fields have no permanent assigned bits, the
configuration is queried from the kernel drivers.

MLX5_SET configures the specified 32-bit field as whole entity.
For metadata register c0 we should take into account the provided
mask in order to configure the specified subfield bits only.

Fixes: acfcd5c52f94 ("net/mlx5: update meta register matcher set")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Matan Azrad Jan. 6, 2020, 2:50 p.m. UTC | #1
From: Viacheslav Ovsiienko
> The metadata register c0 field in the matcher might be split into two
> independent fields - the source vport index and META item value. These
> fields have no permanent assigned bits, the configuration is queried from the
> kernel drivers.
> 
> MLX5_SET configures the specified 32-bit field as whole entity.
> For metadata register c0 we should take into account the provided mask in
> order to configure the specified subfield bits only.
> 
> Fixes: acfcd5c52f94 ("net/mlx5: update meta register matcher set")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c index 4c16281..893db3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> @@ -5742,6 +5742,7 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
>  		MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, matcher,
> misc_parameters_2);
>  	void *misc2_v =
>  		MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, key,
> misc_parameters_2);
> +	uint32_t temp;
> 
>  	data &= mask;
>  	switch (reg_type) {
> @@ -5754,8 +5755,18 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
>  		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v, metadata_reg_b,
> data);
>  		break;
>  	case REG_C_0:
> -		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m,
> metadata_reg_c_0, mask);
> -		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v,
> metadata_reg_c_0, data);
> +		/*
> +		 * The metadata register C0 field might be divided into
> +		 * source vport index and META item value, we should set
> +		 * this field accorfing to specified mask, not as whole one.
> +		 */

Typo - accorfing => according.

> +		temp = MLX5_GET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m,
> metadata_reg_c_0);
> +		temp |= mask;
> +		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m,
> metadata_reg_c_0, temp);
> +		temp = MLX5_GET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v,
> metadata_reg_c_0);
> +		temp &= ~mask;
> +		temp |= data;
> +		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v,
> metadata_reg_c_0, temp);
>  		break;
>  	case REG_C_1:
>  		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m,
> metadata_reg_c_1, mask);

Raslan, please fix the typo in integration.
Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
  
Raslan Darawsheh Jan. 7, 2020, 11:31 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 6, 2020 4:50 PM
> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>; Ori Kam
> <orika@mellanox.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix matcher metadata register c0 field setup
> 
> 
> 
> From: Viacheslav Ovsiienko
> > The metadata register c0 field in the matcher might be split into two
> > independent fields - the source vport index and META item value. These
> > fields have no permanent assigned bits, the configuration is queried
> > from the kernel drivers.
> >
> > MLX5_SET configures the specified 32-bit field as whole entity.
> > For metadata register c0 we should take into account the provided mask
> > in order to configure the specified subfield bits only.
> >
> > Fixes: acfcd5c52f94 ("net/mlx5: update meta register matcher set")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> > b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c index 4c16281..893db3e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> > @@ -5742,6 +5742,7 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
> >  		MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, matcher,
> misc_parameters_2);
> >  	void *misc2_v =
> >  		MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, key,
> > misc_parameters_2);
> > +	uint32_t temp;
> >
> >  	data &= mask;
> >  	switch (reg_type) {
> > @@ -5754,8 +5755,18 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
> >  		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v, metadata_reg_b,
> data);
> >  		break;
> >  	case REG_C_0:
> > -		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m,
> > metadata_reg_c_0, mask);
> > -		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v,
> > metadata_reg_c_0, data);
> > +		/*
> > +		 * The metadata register C0 field might be divided into
> > +		 * source vport index and META item value, we should set
> > +		 * this field accorfing to specified mask, not as whole one.
> > +		 */
> 
> Typo - accorfing => according.
> 
> > +		temp = MLX5_GET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m,
> > metadata_reg_c_0);
> > +		temp |= mask;
> > +		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m,
> > metadata_reg_c_0, temp);
> > +		temp = MLX5_GET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v,
> > metadata_reg_c_0);
> > +		temp &= ~mask;
> > +		temp |= data;
> > +		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v,
> > metadata_reg_c_0, temp);
> >  		break;
> >  	case REG_C_1:
> >  		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m,
> metadata_reg_c_1, mask);
> 
> Raslan, please fix the typo in integration.
> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
> 

Fixed typo issue and applied patch to next-net-mlx.
 
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
  
Ferruh Yigit Jan. 8, 2020, 2:47 p.m. UTC | #3
On 12/20/2019 7:48 AM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> The metadata register c0 field in the matcher might be split
> into two independent fields - the source vport index and META
> item value. These fields have no permanent assigned bits, the
> configuration is queried from the kernel drivers.
> 
> MLX5_SET configures the specified 32-bit field as whole entity.
> For metadata register c0 we should take into account the provided
> mask in order to configure the specified subfield bits only.

Hi Slava,

Is there a more human friendly name for the field instead of "C0"?

I don't know what "matcher metadata register" is, what is the impact of the fix?
Which functionality was broken now fixed? Does it make sense to reflect it in
the patch title / commit log?

Same comment for the related patches:
net/mlx5: fix register c0 usage for metadata entities
net/mlx5: fix metadata item endianness conversion

> 
> Fixes: acfcd5c52f94 ("net/mlx5: update meta register matcher set")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> index 4c16281..893db3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> @@ -5742,6 +5742,7 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
>  		MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, matcher, misc_parameters_2);
>  	void *misc2_v =
>  		MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, key, misc_parameters_2);
> +	uint32_t temp;
>  
>  	data &= mask;
>  	switch (reg_type) {
> @@ -5754,8 +5755,18 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
>  		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v, metadata_reg_b, data);
>  		break;
>  	case REG_C_0:
> -		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m, metadata_reg_c_0, mask);
> -		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v, metadata_reg_c_0, data);
> +		/*
> +		 * The metadata register C0 field might be divided into
> +		 * source vport index and META item value, we should set
> +		 * this field accorfing to specified mask, not as whole one.
> +		 */
> +		temp = MLX5_GET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m, metadata_reg_c_0);
> +		temp |= mask;
> +		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m, metadata_reg_c_0, temp);
> +		temp = MLX5_GET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v, metadata_reg_c_0);
> +		temp &= ~mask;
> +		temp |= data;
> +		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v, metadata_reg_c_0, temp);
>  		break;
>  	case REG_C_1:
>  		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m, metadata_reg_c_1, mask);
>
  
Slava Ovsiienko Jan. 17, 2020, 3:04 p.m. UTC | #4
Raslan,  Ferruh

In these patches (merged in mlx5 tree) just the commit messages are updated:
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/64831/ 
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/64832/
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/64852/

With best regards, Slava

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 16:47
> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
> <rasland@mellanox.com>; Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix matcher metadata register c0
> field setup
> 
> On 12/20/2019 7:48 AM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> > The metadata register c0 field in the matcher might be split into two
> > independent fields - the source vport index and META item value. These
> > fields have no permanent assigned bits, the configuration is queried
> > from the kernel drivers.
> >
> > MLX5_SET configures the specified 32-bit field as whole entity.
> > For metadata register c0 we should take into account the provided mask
> > in order to configure the specified subfield bits only.
> 
> Hi Slava,
> 
> Is there a more human friendly name for the field instead of "C0"?
> 
> I don't know what "matcher metadata register" is, what is the impact of the
> fix?
> Which functionality was broken now fixed? Does it make sense to reflect it in
> the patch title / commit log?
> 
> Same comment for the related patches:
> net/mlx5: fix register c0 usage for metadata entities
> net/mlx5: fix metadata item endianness conversion
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
index 4c16281..893db3e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
@@ -5742,6 +5742,7 @@  struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 		MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, matcher, misc_parameters_2);
 	void *misc2_v =
 		MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, key, misc_parameters_2);
+	uint32_t temp;
 
 	data &= mask;
 	switch (reg_type) {
@@ -5754,8 +5755,18 @@  struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v, metadata_reg_b, data);
 		break;
 	case REG_C_0:
-		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m, metadata_reg_c_0, mask);
-		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v, metadata_reg_c_0, data);
+		/*
+		 * The metadata register C0 field might be divided into
+		 * source vport index and META item value, we should set
+		 * this field accorfing to specified mask, not as whole one.
+		 */
+		temp = MLX5_GET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m, metadata_reg_c_0);
+		temp |= mask;
+		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m, metadata_reg_c_0, temp);
+		temp = MLX5_GET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v, metadata_reg_c_0);
+		temp &= ~mask;
+		temp |= data;
+		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_v, metadata_reg_c_0, temp);
 		break;
 	case REG_C_1:
 		MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc2_m, metadata_reg_c_1, mask);